The Uniqueness of Christ

Theology in Context Seminar / REL 472 / 4 Credits / Northwestern College / Spring 2003

Instructor: Michael Andres

andres@nwciowa.edu 

Office/Hours: VPH 115, ext. 7079

MW 3:30-5:00 / Th 3:00-5:00

Class Time: TTh 9:25-10:55             

Class Location: VPH 202

Course Description:

This course is a research seminar in which students will explore contemporary questions and issues in light of the Christian religious theological tradition. It features the writing and presentation of a major paper, discussions, analysis and critique of research. This semester we will explore issues surrounding the uniqueness of Jesus Christ in a pluralistic world.

Course Objectives:

(1)     To further develop careful research and analytical skills.

(2)     To grasp an orthodox, Chalcedonian doctrine of Christ and salvation, while interacting extensively with other theological traditions.

(3)     To reflect on the meaning and application of biblical authority in Christian theology.

(4)     To think more clearly, consistently, historically and biblically about Christology, faith, salvation, and other religions.

(5)     To consider how one’s view of the uniqueness of Christ ought to affect the faith and practice of the Church and draw one closer to the living God.

Primary Texts:

Bible (modern translation, NIV preferable; bring to every class period).  [B]

John Hick and Brian Hebblethwaite, eds. Christianity and Other Religions: Selected Readings (Oneworld, 2001).

Dennis Okholm and Timothy Phillips, eds., Four Views on Salvation in a Pluralistic World (Zondervan).

John Sanders, No Other Name: An Investigation into the Destiny of the Unevangelized (Eerdmans).

Reformed Church in America, The Crucified One is Lord: Confessing the Uniqueness of Christ in a Pluralist Society (RCA booklet).

Christopher Wright, The Uniqueness of Jesus (Monarch).

Course Requirements:

(1)     Class attendance/participation: Participation and attendance are mandatory; one express purpose of this course is to discuss theological issues in a seminar format.  After three unexcused absences, students will be graded down one half letter grade for every subsequent unexcused absence.

(2)     Readings:  Reading should be completed before class time listed.  It is the responsibility of the student to be aware of forthcoming reading assignments given in syllabus.

(3)         Written Projects: Three written analyses are required.

(4)         Oral Presentation:  One oral presentation is required.

Guidelines for Written Project:

See guidelines at end of syllabus.

Assessment of Written Project:

Students will be evaluated according to the comprehension, analysis, and quality demonstrated in their analyses.  Be sure to give a clearly elucidated argument for your views.  Double space, use normal margins and 12 cpi font. If you use other resources, include proper footnotes/endnotes and bibliography.  Please include name, RSC box #, course, word count, and subject/person analyzed at top of title page.

Course Assessment:

Oral Presentation = 50 points

Written Analysis = 200 points/100 points each

Integration Paper = 200 points

Final Exam Schedule:

No final exam.

Course Assistance:

I have an open door policy.  Please come by my office, preferably at office hours, if you have any questions or are having any problems with the reading, lectures, note taking, written project, etc.  Or come by for a cup of tea and chat about life.  For further assistance in academic matters help is available through Patti Thayer at Academic Support (VPH 125B).  Academic Support is there to help you so if you are having difficulties do not hesitate to ask for assistance.

Web Pages:

http://www.comparativereligion.com/

Course Schedule:

Guidelines for Written Project #1:

(2000 words / 100 points / Due Feb 9)

Compare and contrast a Nicene / Calcedonian Christology with that of early Christian heresies (Arianism, Docetism, Nestorianism, Monophysitism), Rudolph Bultmann, John Hick, Process theologians, and Liberation theologians. Contrast both their view of the nature of Jesus Christ as well as their implications for human salvation.

Your essay should show significant research, do not use only course texts as resources. The extent of your research should be reflected in your bibliography.  Students will be evaluated according to their overall grasp of the subject matter, the clarity of explanation, the fairness of analysis, and the quality of research demonstrated in their paper.  Grammar and spelling are important.  Include proper footnotes/endnotes (Tarabian or MLA acceptable) and full bibliography.  Please indicate name, RSC box #, REL472, date, word count, and subject treated at top of title page.

Guidelines for Oral Presentation:

(30 minute max. / 50 points):

The objective of the oral presentation is to teach your classmates about your given subject. Therefore your presentation should be clear, concise, persuasive, and informative. Demonstrate your superior grasp of the subject, and be prepared to respond to questions. Please pass out a handout with an outline and any other pertinent information covered in your presentation; at top of handout include your name, REL 472, date, and title of presentation (give me a copy at least one half hour in advance of class time and I will copy it free of charge). You may use OHP, video, PowerPoint, marker board, or any other media available to enhance the learning process. Students may be graded on the material you present to them, so strive for accuracy.

In preparation you should thoroughly research your subject. You should consult theological dictionaries and encyclopedias, works treating your subject, and journal articles. Read various sources; be sure to read sources from alternate viewpoints on your subject (e.g. there are differing views on the nature, limits, and value of source criticism). You should also read relevant portions of primary sources (e.g. actually read relevant parts of Calvin’s Institutes and commentaries)! You may use a few key quotations but do not flood your presentation with quotes. As always, do not plagiarize! You must explain the subject in your own words.

Pick out and focus on key, crucial areas in your subject. Be discerning. Put emphasis on main themes (“best”) rather than less-central (“good/interesting”) issues; you do not need to say everything there is to say on your subject. Include very brief historical background if necessary, but omit if unnecessary. Be fair, nuanced, and sensitive to all views on your subject. This presentation is not designed to be an assault on “false views.” Carefully present your subject, noting various differing views, then analyze and evaluate (e.g. specify the strengths and weaknesses of Knitter on pluralism). Try to empathize with and understand the persuasive power of the view you are evaluating, even if you do not finally agree with it. However, do not be afraid to state any fair criticisms of the view. Evaluation should be based on Scripture, church tradition (key theologians, creeds, and confessions), reasonable arguments, findings from general revelation (other disciplines, science, etc.), and Christian experience (but take care that you do not lapse into mere feelings or opinions).

This is a 400 level, capstone course – the standard is high! Demonstrate excellence in your presentation. Be well prepared. If you have difficulties come see Prof. Andres ASAP.

Guidelines for Written Project #2:

(2000 words / 100 points / Due two weeks after oral presentation)

Communicate material from oral presentation in writing. The same criteria apply from that of oral presentation. The written project should, however, be more comprehensive, detailed, and documented. You can say more in 2000 words written than in 30 minutes spoken.

Students will be evaluated according to the overall grasp of subject matter, the clarity of explanation, the fairness of analysis, and quality of research demonstrated in their paper. Grammar and spelling are important. Clearly elucidated reasons for the given evaluation should be evident. Do not simply regurgitate information. Include proper footnotes/ endnotes (Tarabian or MLA acceptable) and full bibliography. Please indicate name, RSC box #, REL472, date, word count, and subject treated at top of title page.

Guidelines for Integration Paper #3:

(2500 words / 200 points / Due May 9)

This paper consists in two parts: (1) state and argue for your own view of the uniqueness of Jesus Christ, and (2) demonstrate how your view of the uniqueness of Jesus Christ relates, integrates, and influences other subjects in both religion and the liberal arts. You need not discuss every single topic and issue listed below, but you should discuss several of the most significant from each paragraph.

(1) Articulate carefully your doctrine of Jesus Christ. Make sure to include discussion of various aspects of the person and work of Christ, the nature of salvation and faith, and the relation of these to other religions. Why do you hold this view (use biblical, logical, theological, historical, experiential arguments)? Respond to possible objections.

(2) Explain and demonstrate how your view of Jesus Christ interacts, integrates, supports, challenges, forms and is formed by the following, and give at least one fully developed example of each:

     (a) other theological doctrines (God, creation, humanity, sin, Christ, salvation, sanctification, last things, etc.);

     (b) by other disciplines within the study of religion; e.g. church history, missiology, New and Old Testament studies, Christian ethics, Christian education, youth ministry, philosophy of religion, and so on;

     (c) other disciplines in the liberal arts (e.g. world or American history, psychology, sociology, political science, philosophy, literature, music, arts, and hard sciences like biology, chemistry physics, etc.).

Your essay should show significant research, do not use only course texts as resources. The extent of your research should be reflected in your bibliography. Students will be evaluated according to their overall grasp of the subject matter, the clarity of explanation, the extent and depth of integration, and the quality of research demonstrated in their paper. Grammar and spelling are important. Include proper footnotes/endnotes (Tarabian or MLA acceptable) and full bibliography. Please indicate name, RSC box #, REL472, date, word count, and subject treated at top of title page.

Paul at the Areopagus