Northwestern College
Topics in Cross-Cultural History:
CHINESE CIVILIZATION
History 230, Spring Semester 2011
(4 Credits)
|
Professor: Douglas Firth |
Class Period: T/Th, 12:05-1:35 p.m. |
|
Office, Phone, & E-mail:
VPH 212, x7054, firth@nwciowa.edu |
Class Location: VPH 126 |
|
Office hours: MWF, 2:10-3:10 p.m.,
or by appt. |
Special
Advisor: Grace Rohrer |
|
Instructor’s
web page: http://home.nwciowa.edu/firth/ Course LibGuide: http://nwciowa.libguides.com/china
Course
materials and grades available on MyNorthwestern (My NWC) |
|
|
WISDOM
FOR JOURNEYING IN THE PAST I. Why Study History? A. [W]e intend Northwestern graduates to be
persons who Engage Ideas
From the NWC Vision for Learning B. Life can only be understood backwards
... . Soren Kierkegaard, as quoted in Laurence J. Peter, ed., Peter's
Quotations: Ideas for Our Time (New York: Bantam Books, 1977),
305. C. [H]istory holds the
potential ... of humanizing us in ways offered by few other areas in the
school curriculum. ... Sam Wineburg, Historical
Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past
( II. Why Isn't Studying and Understanding History Simple? A. [H]istory [i]s a web of contingency. Contingency is about
events, choices, and agency. Webs are about structures and processes, which
amplify the agency of individual choices in some ways, and constrain them in
others. David Hackett Fischer, "Response to Yerxa, Kersh, Glen, and Morone," Historically Speaking 7 (Sept./Oct. 2005), 25. B. The historian … might well take as her
credo this statement by Karl Marx from The
Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte:
“Men make their own history, but they do not make it just as they
please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves,
but under circumstances directly encountered, given, and transmitted from the
past. …” Or, as stated more concisely in The German Ideology, “circumstances make men just as much
as men make circumstances.” David Nasaw, “AHR Roundtable: Historians and Biography.
Introduction,” American
Historical Review 114 (June 2009): 578. C. History-making . . . is a creative enterprise, by means of which we
fashion out of fragments of human memory and selected evidence of the past a
mental construct of a coherent past world that makes sense to the present. Gerda Lerner, “The Necessity of History,” in Why History
Matters: Life and Thought, idem (New York: Oxford University Press,
1997), 117. III. Perspectives from or on China’s Civilization Confucius answered [Chi K’ang
Tzu], “In administering your government, what need is there for you to
kill? Just desire the good yourself and the common people will be good. The
virtue of the gentleman is like wind; the virtue of the small man is like the
grass. Let the wind blow over the grass and it is sure to bend.” Confucius, The
Analects, trans. D.C. Lau (London: Penguin Books, 1979), Bk. 12:19, pp.
115-116. It is
easy to maintain a situation while it is still secure; It is
easy to deal with a situation before symptoms develop; It is
easy to break a thing when it is yet brittle; It is
easy to dissolve a thing when it is yet minute. Deal with
a thing while it is still nothing; Keep a
thing in order before disorder sets in. A tree
that can fill the span of a man’s arms grows from a downy tip; A terrace
nine storeys high Rises
from hodfuls
of earth; A journey
of a thousand miles Starts
from beneath one’s feet. Lao Tzu, Tao
Te Ching, trans. D.C. Lau (London: Penguin Books, 1963), Bk 2:64, p. 125. To
the Greeks, the hero might not be bad, but he might be fundamentally and
tragically mistaken. To the Chinese, a hero, by definition, was good; his
mistakes, if he made any, were likely to be tactical in nature. His intent
was free from error and regret. David N. Keightley,
“Early Civilization in Chinese
… instinctively divide people into those with whom they already have a
fixed relationship, a connection, what the Chinese call guan-xi [kuan-hsi],
and those they don’t. These connections operate like a series of
invisible threads, tying Chinese to each other with far greater tensile
strength than mere friendship in the West would do. Ambrose Yeo-chi King,
“Kuan-hsi and The
use of ritual to validate cultural status is indicative of the Chinese focus
on proper behavior rather than on proper ideas, on orthopraxy rather than
orthodoxy. Myron L. Cohen, “Being Chinese: The Peripheralization of Traditional Identity,” Daedalus 120
(Spring 1991): 117. China’s many pasts have burdened the
present with some unbearable loads: the constant presence of history;
the traditions of autocracy that are still, in their zombie-like way, alive; economic
and social forms that appear to offer no way out of the inherited problems
that they can only perpetuate and exacerbate. All these problems are linked
by a unified high culture that has had great successes in imposing and
perpetuating itself and has also produced and sustained a great civilization.
But are this high culture and this civilization still alive? W.J.F. Jenner, The Tyranny of History: The Roots of IV. How Might a Historical and Christian Perspective Shape Our
Understanding of Chinese Civilization? Does Micah’s injunction to “do justice, love kindness, and
walk humbly with your God” (6:8) have any bearing on a
Christian’s historical work? I
believe that it does. We do justice
when we give all the historical actors their due, not privileging those who
had the most power, or for whom we have more data. Loving kindness means exercising compassion
towards our historical subjects. They
were no more limited by their location and biases than we are. They were creating their lives as they
went; we need to re-create those lives with a minimum of moralizing. To walk humbly is to recognize that even
hindsight is not fully accurate and that our accounts are never definitive.
|
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
What is this course? The topic of this course is Chinese civilization. This course counts
toward the General Education Cross-Cultural requirement, which among other
things means that it is interdisciplinary. The primary disciplinary
perspective, however, is historical. Various aspects of Chinese society and
culture, including politics, economics, philosophy, the fine arts, popular
mores, and religion, will be examined in historical context (i.e., the
processes of change and continuity in time).
What will class meetings be like? The course will meet twice a week for an hour and a half. In general, class
will be mixed: some lecture, some discussion, perhaps some viewing of a video
or slides. Sometimes there will be student reports. And, a few days will be
exam days!
What will be expected in general of each student? The workload of the course reflects both liberal arts expectations in
general and historical method in particular. Attendance at all class
meetings is, of course, expected. Some 2200pp. of reading will be
required (1500 assigned + 700 research). Assignments
include an in-class essay exam, a web 2.0 group project, a biographical report,
a book essay, and a Course Forum.
COURSE OBJECTIVES (WHAT DIFFERENCE THIS COURSE
SHOULD MAKE):
COURSE OUTLINE:
|
Date (T/Th) |
In-Class Subjects |
Reading Assignments |
|
Jan. 11 |
The Mandate of Heaven; |
|
|
Jan. 13 |
Course Introduction II; |
*Zhu, p. 19 |
|
Jan. 18 |
Ancient |
* |
|
Jan. 20 |
The Hundred Schools of Thought |
* |
|
Jan. 25 |
Confucian Traditions |
*Ebrey, Sourcebook,
pp. 42-45, 57-59, 64-68, 72-76, 91-96, 128-131, 155-168, 172-177, 195-201,
238-266; *Zhu, pp. 174-175. |
|
Jan. 27 |
Imperial China I: The Qin & the Han |
* |
|
Feb. 1 |
Daoism & Buddhism |
*Ebrey, China, Chap.
4; |
|
Feb. 3 |
Red
Cliff I |
*film |
|
Feb. 8 |
Red
Cliff II |
*film |
|
Feb. 10 |
Red
Cliff III |
*film |
|
Feb. 15 |
WEB PROJECT WORK DAY |
|
|
Feb. 17 |
Imperial |
* |
|
Feb. 22 |
LAUNCHING AN AMERICAN GUIDE TO RED CLIFF/ Chinese Literary Traditions & Fine Arts |
*Ebrey, Sourcebook,
pp. 11-13, 105-108, 169-171, 226-237, 304-308 |
|
Feb. 24 |
Imperial |
* |
|
Mar. 1 |
BOOK ROUNDTABLE: The Death of Woman Wang |
*Spence |
|
Mar. 3 |
|
*Blum, pdf on My NWC |
|
Mar. 17 |
Imperial |
* |
|
Mar. 22 |
Republican |
* |
|
Mar. 24 |
Communist |
* |
|
Mar. 29 |
BIOGRAPHICAL REPORT TOPICS DUE; |
*Cheek, pp. 1-124 |
|
Mar. 31 |
Communist |
*Cheek, pp. 125-231 |
|
Apr. 5 |
Post-Mao |
* |
|
Apr. 7 |
Contemporary |
*Zhu, pp. 13-46 |
|
Apr. 12 |
Contemporary |
*Zhu, pp. 95-132 |
|
Apr. 14 |
Contemporary |
*Zhu, pp. 133-185 |
|
Apr. 19 |
Contemporary Hong Kong & Taiwan |
*Zhu, pp. 51-94, 186-197 |
|
Apr. 26 |
Raise
the Red Lantern I |
*film |
|
Apr. 28 |
Raise
the Red Lantern II |
*film |
|
May 3 |
ORAL REPORTS of BIOGRAPHIES |
|
|
May 5 |
ORAL REPORTS of BIOGRAPHIES |
|
|
May 11 |
FINAL EXAM (Wed., 8-10 a.m.) |
|
COURSE REQUIREMENTS:
1.
2. Assignments:
A. AN IN-CLASS EXAM will
constitute 25% of the course grade.
B. A WEB GUIDE TO RED
CLIFF/
·
The film Red
Cliff will be shown in its entirety in class (Feb. 3, 8, 10).
·
The abridged novel Romance of the Three Kingdoms is on reserve in Ramaker.
·
Course texts, as relevant.
·
Other materials located through Course LibGuide.
·
An explanation of the
interconnections of historical events, the Romance
of the Three Kingdoms, and Red Cliff.
·
A concise summary of Romance of the Three Kingdoms.
·
A concise summary of Red Cliff.
·
A map of places important in the
film and novel.
·
A concise, critical analysis of
how well Red Cliff reflects a)
ancient Chinese history and culture and b) relevant parts of Romance of the Three Kingdoms.
·
A bibliography (in Chicago
Style) of materials used.
·
The completed website will be presented in class by
the students on Feb. 22.
·
In addition to the website, each student will hand
in (an e-copy via My NWC) on Feb. 22 a 2-page reflection on the project. This
written reflection should contain a) a summary of the student’s
participation in the project and reflections on the most important thing(s)
learned about b)
·
meets the specifications for content in #6 above
·
is researched
·
is written
·
is the fruit of effective, balanced teamwork
(including 2-page written reflections)
·
provides a thoughtful,
critical, and user-friendly introduction for Red Cliff and the Romance of
the Three Kingdoms.
C. A BIOGRAPHICAL REPORT will constitute 25% of the
course grade.
·
The topic statement will not be graded. However,
failure to submit a statement meeting the above specifications will mean that
the final report will receive a penalty reduction of a third of a letter grade.
(For example, if the final report receives a B+, the penalty will knock it down to a
B.)
·
Resources: Before starting from scratch, first check
relevant assigned reading for this course to see what sources might appear
there. Then, check the Course LibGuide. The kinds of sources that could be
useful include book-length biographies; biographical articles in specialized
reference works; specialized online materials; articles in periodicals and
scholarly journals; sections in books about topics in which the biographee was significant; primary materials by the biographee or about the biographee
(written during or not long after their lifetime); etc. Note: avoid
general reference works, e.g. Encyclopedia Britannica or World Book, and also
avoid Wikipedia, as sources (these can be used, however, to point you to more
reliable or detailed sources).
·
Written report overall:
The entire report should be typed double spaced except where note or
bibliography form specifies otherwise; 5-8 pages long including annotated
bibliography and footnotes in Chicago Style; no title page, but with a header
including at least the student’s name, their e-address, and a title.
·
Written report, Part 1: The
first portion of the report should
consist of 3-6 pages combining a critical synopsis of the biographee’s
life with an assessment of their historical significance. That is, the first
part of the report should present material that analytically answers the
following questions about the topic: a) what are the most important
biographical details about the biographee? b)
what interpretive challenges and/or controversies, if
any, have there been about the biographee? c)
in what way is the biographee
historically significant for understanding either the society or culture of
·
Written report, Part 2: The
second portion of the written report
is the annotated bibliography.
This should consist of 5-8 annotated items. Each annotation
should consist of 2 or more sentences: a) at least one sentence should
indicate in a summary way the relevant contents of the particular item (i.e.,
convince a reader that you have actually examined the item you list), and b)
at least one sentence should in some manner assess the usefulness of the
material (e.g., how does one source compare to another? how detailed is the source?
does the information seem accurate, and why? does the source give clues as to its
sources? does the item have a discernible point of view or even bias?). Organize
your bibliography either strictly alphabetically by author, or by kind of
source. The form should be Chicago Style; note how Timothy Cheek does his
bibliography in Mao Zedong and
China’s Revolutions, pp. 237-242.
·
Oral presentation: On the assigned day,
the student should orally present the first portion of their report to the
class. Plan on taking up to 10 minutes, plus time for questions and discussion,
for each report.
·
meets the specifications above, including the oral
presentation
·
is diligently researched and accurate
·
is clearly written
·
thoughtfully and insightfully
analyzes the biographee’s life and
significance.
D. A BOOK ESSAY will constitute 15% of the course grade.
·
meets the specifications above
·
shows evidence of considering the book in light of
relevant course materials
·
is clearly written
·
thoughtfully and insightfully
engages all or a significant part of Spence’s book.
E. DISCUSSION/PARTICIPATION will together
constitute 10% of the course grade.
·
The Forum takes place in a “portlet” located on the Collaboration page for this
course on My NWC.
·
Participation in the Forum will be graded on a points basis, 9 possible total points for each of 4
“units” of course readings (including visual and video materials).
·
The 4 units are
1) Classes
from Jan. 18-Feb. 8
2) Classes
from Feb. 15-Mar. 3
3) Classes
from Mar. 17-31
4) Classes
from Apr. 5-19
·
The instructor will suggest online in the Forum a
discussion topic by the beginning class date and time of each unit, i.e., 12:05
p.m. Jan. 18, and so on.
·
Each written contribution to the Forum is worth a
possible 3 points:
1) a
point for participating
2) a
second point for participation that shows adequate clarity, focus, and
familiarity with relevant course materials
3) a
third point for participation that goes beyond adequate participation, e.g.,
showing critical thought and/or insight and/or wisdom in developing the
Forum’s topic or responding to others in the Forum; suggesting and
advancing a new topic from course materials; developing (not merely repeating)
a point from in-class discussion
·
To count toward the possible points in a given
unit, a Forum contribution must be made between class time of the beginning
date of each unit and 11:55 p.m. of the day after the unit ends, i.e., between
12:05 p.m., Jan. 18 and 11:55 p.m. Feb. 9, and so on.
·
Once a unit is over, no more contributions to it
are allowed. That is, each possible 9 points must be made during the
“life” of the unit.
COURSE MISCELLANY:
1. Late Written Assignments
2. Academic Honesty
3. Grading
|
A = 90-100 |
B = 80-89 |
C = 70-79 |
D = 60-69 |
F = 0-59 |
|
|
|
|
+ = x7-x9 |
- = x0-x2 |
|
|
|
|
4. Further Help