Fifth Sunday in Easter Acts 13.44-52
9 May 2004 Psalm
145.1-9
The Rev. Karen A. H. Wacome, Presiding
Dr. Donald H. Wacome,
Lay Preacher
A striking feature of this morning’s text, in which Jesus
commands his disciples to love one another, is where John locates it: he puts
it between two accounts of betrayal.
Jesus speaks these words right after Judas goes out into the night on his
mission to betray Jesus to arrest and death.
And in the verses immediately following today’s lesson Jesus deflates an
overconfident Peter: “before sunrise you will have denied me three times”
(John 13.38b). In the dark of this
night Jesus talks to his disciples of love and glory, yet he is surrounded by
betrayal. His friends will not love him, they’ll abandon him and deny him. I suspect that to understand what Jesus
means when he gives this new command we need to hear it against this background. Jesus commands us to love one another, not
in some imaginary world where we are reliably loving and trustworthy, but in
this world, where if there is to be love at all, it can be only in the face of
broken trust, a way to live with those who fail us, wrong us, hurt us. Jesus knows that soon enough his disciples
will know what Judas has done, and despise him for it. In a moment he’ll tell Peter that he’s not
that different from Judas; he’ll betray Jesus too. It’s here that he tells them to love one
another. Whatever love they can have
for one another lies ahead, taking the form of forgiveness. The love Jesus commands cannot be separated
from what he commands us to ask when we pray:
Forgive our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.
The central event of Ian McEwen’s novel Atonement
occurs when precocious 13-year old Briony Tallis, acting in a confusion of motives clear not
even to her, but not without jealousy and spite, tells a lie that effectively
ruins the lives of her sister Cecilia and of Robbie Turner, a friend of the Tallis
family with whom Cecilia is in love.
The rest of the novel is a prolonged meditation on the final
impossibility of making right a horrendous injustice, on the futile hope for
forgiveness in the face of the unforgivable.
Years later Briony, realizing the enormity of
what she has done and her utter inability to repair the damage says: “The
only conceivable solution would be for the past never to have happened”
(272). Forgiveness can lie beyond our
capacities despite our best intentions.
Human beings can find themselves in the dark night where atonement
cannot be made, where there is no possibility of love.
In another novel, Thomas Berger’s Changing the Past,
the nondescript main character Walter Hunsicker is
given the opportunity to live his life over again, to select a different and
better life than the one he has lived up to now. He chooses, and tries out other lives: as a
Donald Trump, as a great writer, as a famous comedian, as a talk radio
psychologist and First Gentleman of the
The God who comes to us in Jesus does not undo the past; he
forgives it. He resurrects it. The betrayal, the doubt and anguish, the
arrest and crucifixion are not undone.
Death is not denied, but it is defeated; the tomb is empty, the
disciples who betrayed and lost Jesus are found by him. Later in John’s Gospel (21.15-19) there’s
that wonderful scene where the resurrected Jesus confronts Peter, but not as a
triumphant victor ready to mete out vengeance on those who betrayed him. There is no recrimination, no judgment, no
examination of past failure and shame, no attempt to make good; just the probing
question: “Do you love me?”
Jesus forgives Peter; that means he is inviting him to go forward with
him into the new life his life, death and resurrection open for him. For forgiveness is not really about the
past, but the future. To accept God’s
forgiveness is to accept God’s completely unconditional and open-ended offer of
a future with him, the life to come, the life already present as we love one
another, forgiving as we are forgiven.
To forgive someone is to choose a future with him,
a future not dictated by past wrongs but opened up in love and freedom. We need to see ourselves in Peter: deniers
but acknowledged, utterly forgiven, utterly beloved.
As the author of John’s gospel tells is in another place (1
John 4.8,16): God is love. To know the god of Jesus Christ
crucified, the God who forgives and accepts us all, the God who rejects
a future where our rejections of him get the last word, is to know God as he
truly is. I often hear dissatisfaction
with this: “Yes, but God is also just, and he can’t just
forgive…forgiveness has to be somehow paid for…” There’s the ever-popular, but in my view
profoundly mistaken, business about God having to appease some internal
principle of justice. Of course God is
just…but what is God’s justice? No
moral principle, Greek and abstract, but the covenant righteousness of YHWH,
God’s faithfulness, his implacable, indeed ruthless, and sometimes downright
scary commitment to the people he loves.
It’s not for the decorous or the faint of heart; God’s relentless
pursuit of those he so passionately desires is strewn with the wreckage of the
distractions and disloyalties that get in his way, the smashed idols of our
illusory self-sufficiency and self-righteousness. God is just, but his justice is always in
the service of his steadfast love.
William Countryman puts it beautifully:
“As far down into God as we shall ever be able to reach, we will find
nothing but love. And in whatever is
beneath that, in whatever abysses of God there are that we can never plumb,
there is nothing but love” (Forgiven and Forgiving, p. 128).
In God’s world, nothing is lost and everything is
redeemed. Nothing and no one, not the
blowhard Peter, not the treacherous Judas, not you, not me
sinks irredeemably, out of the reach of God in Christ. We’re all forgiven,
we’re all called to love one another, forgiving as we are forgiven, drawn into,
and carrying out, God’s work. Even Judas? There’s
a long tradition, recently rendered in
When I went out to kill myself, I caughtA pack of hoodlums beating up a man.
Running to spare his suffering, I forgotMy name, my number, how my day began,How soldiers milled around the garden stoneAnd sang amusing songs; how all that dayTheir javelins measured crowds; how I aloneBargained the proper coins, and slipped away. Banished from heaven, I found this victim beaten,Stripped, kneed, and left to cry. Dropping my ropeAside, I ran, ignored the uniforms:Then I remembered bread my flesh had eaten,The kiss that ate my flesh. Flayed without hope,
I held the man for nothing in my arms.
Even as Judas condemns himself,
and tries to fling himself into the outer darkness, the Jesus he betrayed will
not give up his grip, but draws him back into love and light. That seems to me the better story, the one
that fits the scandalous truth of the cross of Christ. And I have to ask: are my denials of Jesus,
my betrayals, my refusals of his love so different? Judas, no less than
Peter, my brother under the skin?
We need to see ourselves in Judas too: betrayers,
yet defeated and brought home by forgiving love.
Jesus says people will know we belong to him by the way we
love one another. I think a big part
of this is being the community where forgiveness lives. Some of it seems too hard for human
beings. A lot of it is pretty
mundane. More often
bearing in love one another’s infirmities of knowledge, judgment, belief and
taste, than a matter of forgiving momentous iniquities. We’re commanded to be at the ready not to
bother with the fact that we’re in the right, to betray justice, to be disloyal
to all sorts of good and important things, always ready to abandon the all too
legitimate claims of the past in order to keep open the hope of a redeemed
future, ready to walk together out of the darkness into the light of a new
world, the world the resurrected Jesus is bringing into being.
Amen.
Judas, by Kestutis Vasiliunas (woodcut, 1995)